Each element should be followed by the punctuation mark shown here. Earlier editions of the handbook included the place of publication and required different punctuation such as journal editions in parentheses and colons after issue numbers. In the current version, punctuation is simpler only commas and periods separate the elementsand information about the source is kept to the basics. End this element with a period.
In the Nicomachean Ethics, Greek philosopher Aristotle attempts to pinpoint just how one should go about being a good and virtuous person. Of course the choices we make are the result of free will, even when we choose the wrong thing. He clearly shows us how important it is to Aristotle views on tragedy essay aware of the danger that ignorance poses when we are trying to become better people.
Is it the fact that they give you that pleasure at that moment; the fact that each of them is pleasurable? Or is it the fact that, in the long term, they make you ill, or make you poor, or bring about lots of other things like that? They bring momentary pleasures, but can have many unpleasant consequences if not approached with caution.
Socrates also observes that while some good things may be painful at first, such as going to the doctor and working out, we do them because of the good results we will gain in the long run Protagoras p. Knowing this, the claim a person might make for doing bad things looks ridiculous: If the painful consequences outweigh the pleasure, then why would anyone do bad things at all?
That is the Socratic paradox. To some, this may seem like a far-fetched claim. Aristotle begins by discussing different kinds of involuntary acts. He notes that with some actions done involuntarily through ignorance, a person may be unaffected by the consequences.
Next, Aristotle explains that involuntary actions cannot always be blamed on ignorance.
If people were to make choices in complete ignorance of what they are doing, then whatever bad results come of it would be their own fault for not being better informed. Therefore they can be forgiven according to Aristotle.
While people should not be excused from the consequences of their actions if they were totally ignorant of what they were doing, it is easy to understand that sometimes people might not understand fully some aspect of what they are doing, such as what the result will be or whom it will affect.
The killing would be involuntary for we were trying to save a life, but our ignorance of the effect of our actions would result in a death. Aristotle also makes it clear that it is not only bad actions that are involuntary, as it might have seemed in Protagoras.
Of course, he says, that would be ridiculous Ethics p. Ignorance can cause both good and bad actions, but in order to prevent the bad ones we must avoid ignorance as much as possible. Someone arguing against them might use the example of people who smoke cigarettes in spite of the ill effects that smoking is known to cause.
If they could look into the future and see themselves with lung cancer, they would likely make an effort to quit smoking. We cannot know exactly what the future holds, so we must become as well-educated as possible as to the risks we are taking when we participate in potentially painful activities.
In order to live the most pleasurable life possible, we must free ourselves from ignorance and become experts at weighing the possible effects of the decisions we make. Even today, their advice might help us live the best and most pleasurable lives possible.
While many aspects of our lives are out of our control, ignorance is something that can be prevented.A tragedy by definition is “a drama which recounts an important and casually related series of events in the life of a person of significance, such events culminating in an unhappy catastrophe, the whole treated with great dignity and seriousness”.
Aristotle conceives of ethical theory as a field distinct from the theoretical sciences. Its methodology must match its subject matter—good action—and must respect the fact that in this field many generalizations hold only for the most part.
Comparison of Tragedies written by Miller and Aristotle Essay Sample. For a story to be a tragedy it has to follow the principles set by Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, or those of Arthur Miller who is a twentieth century playwright.
Essay on Definitions of a Tragedy: Shakespeare's and Aristotle's - In writing a tragedy, there are certain standards and guidelines to which an author or playwright must follow. Philosophy of law: Philosophy of law, branch of philosophy that investigates the nature of law, especially in its relation to human values, attitudes, practices, and political communities.
Traditionally, philosophy of law proceeds by articulating and defending propositions about law that are general and. Jun 18, · Aristotle Essays (Examples) Filter results by: Essay Paper #: Aristotle and Tragedy To Aristotle, tragedy had to follow certain characteristics.
These included certain rendering of protagonist, the style of the writing, the direction of the plot, the diction, the reflection, the context, and the melody.
His views .